breeze /br 210_06-10-04 realexperiment

Breeze Olsson: Notes on The Real Experiment (1983) – 10/04/2006

The article compares (mostly by contrast) ARTlike and LIFElike avant-garde art arguing that they are contrasting philosophies of reality.

In early days, certain characteristics of emerging LIFElike art were common (albeit not necessarily recognized or labeled as such at the time (how different would it have been if ‘we knew’?):

At the time: Non-art was transformed simply by framing it in accordance to ARTlike standards (junkyard transported to gallery); thus limited by physical space.

Although the more ‘fresh’ genre still tried displaying in ARTlike setting, successfully moving away from traditional community of arts broke the loop. This meant going away from the underlying traditional/historical nature of art itself, bringing its purpose closer to individual -- self-centering the intention as a meditative and therapeutic technique; self improvement.

IF LIFELIKE ART DOESN’T RESEMBLE ART AS WE’VE KNOWN IT, BUT RESEMBLES REAL LIFE, WHAT THEN MAKES IT ART?

“Purposive and interpretive acts instead of mere routine behavior,”… a way “of sharing responsibility for what may be the world’s most pressing problem.”


“Suppose you telephone your own answering device and leave a message that you called – you might learn something about yourself.
Suppose you offer to sweep a friend’s house, andd then spread the gathered dust through your own place – you might learn something about friendship.
Suppose you watch a clear sky and wait for a cloud to form – you might learn something about nature. Suppose you wait longer, for the sky to clear – you might learn something else about yourself.”


Page Details
Contact DANM  |  Digital Arts and New Media  |  Arts Division  |  Grad Division
login