What would a cyborg political framework look like? How would it avoid the pitfalls of appropriating or additive politics? Haraway also states that this essay exists within the socialist-feminist culture and theory - how does this essay function within and outside the imbedded ideologies of socialism and socialist feminism?
Ironic political myth
Common language
Feminist Socialism and Socialism
Materialism
Cyborg and cyborg identity
Gender and cyborg gender
Affinity
Deadly Games
Informatics of Domination
Women of Color
Integrated Circuit
"This essay is an argument for pleasure in the confusion of boundaries and for responsibility in their construction. It is also an effort to contribute to socialist-feminist culture and theory in a post-modernist, non-naturalist mode and in the utopian tradition of imagining a world without gender, which is perhaps a world without genesis, but maybe also a world without end. The cyborg incarnation is outside salvation history" (67).
"Writing is pre-eminently the technology of cyborgs, etched surfaces of the late twentieth century. Cyborg politics is the struggle or language and the struggle against the one code tha translates all meaning perfectly, the central dogma of phallogocentrism. That is why cyborg politics insist on nouse and advocate pollution, rejoicing in the illegitimate fusions of animal and machine" (95).
"Up till now (once upon a time), female embodiment seemed to be given, organic, necessary; and female embodiment seemed to mean skill in mothering and its metaphoric extensions. Only be being out of place could we take intense pleasures in machines, and then with excuses that this was organic activity after all, appropriate to females. Cyborgs might consider more seriously the partial, fluid, sometimes aspect of sex and sexual embodiment. Gneder might not be global identity after all" (99)